Monday, May 18, 2015

Balance between Generosity and Greed

Many of us often wonder what makes people greedy.  When we have the opportunity to be generous we usually feel so much better.  Why is that we often witness greed to the point of being inconsiderate of other people's hardships?
I grew up in a family where generosity was of highly important value.  Here is my favorite story from my mother's childhood in Mashhad.  They were six kids living in a small house.  My mother got up one night and saw that her mom was sitting at the sewing machine and making clothes.  She asked her why she is staying up and working so late.  Her answer was:  We are not rich enough to give money to the poor.  What I can do for them is make clothes for their children.
This is the way I was brought up:  Being generous toward the more unfortunate people.  It is a basic value of our common humanity.
My education and research career has taught me that all humans (all living things in fact) are made of the same basic molecules, same genetic material.  We survive using the same biochemical pathways.  Research continuously shows us the complex processes in fine balance in our bodies.  In the past decade great advances have been made in brain research, mapping areas of the brain active in various activities.  These brain studies together with psychological experiments slowly begin to reveal the reasons for our behavior.
One study had this conclusion: “Greed, Not Generosity, More Likely to Be ‘Paid Forward’”
Here is a description of one experiment:
In one experiment, researchers recruited 100 people from subway stations and tourist areas in Cambridge, Mass., to play an economic game. They told participants that someone had split $6 with them and then gave them an envelope that contained the entire $6 for a generous split, $3 for an equal split, or nothing for a greedy split. The participants then received an additional $6 that they could split in another envelope with a future recipient, essentially paying it forward.
Receiving a generous split didn’t prompt any greater generosity than receiving equal treatment, but people who received nothing in the first envelope were more likely to put little or nothing in the second envelope, depriving future recipients because of the greed they had experienced. The average amount paid forward by participants who received a greedy split was $1.32, well below an equal split of $3.
The results confirmed the researchers’ hypothesis that greed would prevail because negative stimuli have more powerful effects on thoughts and actions than positive stimuli. Focusing on the negative may cause unhappiness, but it makes sense as an evolutionary survival skill. “If there is a tiger nearby, you really have to take notice or you’ll get eaten,” he said. “If there is a beautiful sunset or delicious food, it’s not a life-or-death situation.”

A simple story I heard from a kinder garden teacher describing 3-4 years old kids.  They are given some toys or some food.  The kids instinctive reaction is to check how exactly the toys were distributed; they have to make sure no one got any more than they did.  They would bitterly complain if someone got one millimeter extra! 

As much as we think that we have modern advanced societies, the basic values of compassion and humanity still need to be taught.  Humans are still being born with strong “Fight or Flight” instincts.  The hope is that with continuous education we will reform future generations to the point where the gene pool will progress away from these survival instincts.  This is the process of achieving the fine balance.

The regions in the brain that light up when we are curious: 





Thursday, May 14, 2015

Balance of Abundance and Scarcity

I'd like to point out that in our modern world there is potential for abundance in almost every imaginable resource.  Clear examples that come to mind are the abundance of energy from the sun and the abundance of water in our planet.
Most of all there is abundance of new ideas coming up every day with the help of our collective intelligence and imagination.
The idea of scarcity came about from our history of hunting and gathering, the time where we did not have the tools and the technology we have today.  There was no agriculture or print or highly developed industries.  Our survival instincts caused us to believe the scarcity is detrimental.
It is often and common that we hear about water shortages or an energy crisis.  We easily get into a conflict mode and debate as to how to resolve these shortages.
The current drought in California is considered the worst in over a hundred years.  Studies of tree rings show this drought is worst in over 1200 years.
Please check my March 29 post on Israel and water.  This is what Booky Oren pointed out:  There is all the snow on the mountains.  There are floods.  There is the ocean water that can be desalinated.  It is possible for humans to use their ingenuity and imagination to create a water delivery system that is efficient and equitable for all.
In the past century we have been utilizing coal mines, fossil fuel and atomic power plants to create energy.  Each of these methods caused multiple problems in our planet.  The time is here when we are ready to utilize the abundant energy from our sun.  Solar panels are getting improved every day and there is the vision and technology to harness this energy in batteries.

The concern about scarcity follows us throughout our lives.  If some people are very rich we feel that they take all there is and leave nothing for us.  But the idea of abundance is the idea that there is always plenty for all and as people have more opportunities they also create more abundance. 
Watch this video on Tesla Energy by Elon Musk:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NvCIhn7_FXI&feature=youtu.be

Wind Farm in Germany:



Tesla battery for the home:










Tuesday, May 5, 2015

Balance of Power and Ideas

We always hear about the power balance between the two super powers US and Russia.  In the future China maybe one of the superpowers. Each superpower needs to keep as many allies and areas of influence as it can.  Who is first at the arms race?  Who is best at space exploration?  It is a fine balance.
These superpowers have their blocks of supporters in the United Nations.  Many of our world's conflicts are fought over in this organization.  One of the conflicts we hear about most is the Israeli Arab conflict.
To try and understand this conflict I have started with the Jewish history highlights.  (one of my earlier posts.)  The Jews call this country their home as they have no other home.
Let's check the balance here:  There are 20 million Jews in the world.  The number of Muslims is close to a billion.  That is a thousand million!  The number of Muslims keep growing.  Out of these 400 million are Arabs.

This map shows the areas where Arabs and Jews live:




The Jews represent the idea of one god but they also have the story of exile and persecution.  This idea of one god was further evolved by Christianity and Islam.  There were many cases where Jews were converted to Christians or to Muslims.
Jews like those in my family who migrated to Mashhad refused to convert.  For them being Jewish in unchangeable.
The balance of these two ideas is that the Muslim world is unable to accept an independent Jewish state.  The conflict is going on for 67 years and there are still refugees from the 1948 war.
There are certainly Israeli Jews that are extremely radical.  They settle in the west bank and the government supports them despite Israelis public opinion.  But have a look if these Jewish radicals are in any balance with Muslim radicals around the world.  There are certainly friendly Arab nations and enlightened Muslims.  But all I hear is constant bashing of Israel.  Demonizing Israel to the point of sanctions and boycott of Israeli academic institutions.
And there is Iran with its own history of glory and defeat.  Iran is the country where my family came from.  These people who are considerate and polite, people who speak Farsi and love it.  Iran joins this Israel bashing full force.  "Death to Israel" is declared in every speech and written on signs in every mosque.  One US senator came up with the point that Iran should recognize Israel as a Jewish state in order to end the sanctions against it.  This simple point is considered a "poison pill."  My question is why?  Why is it so impossible for them to accept a small state representing such a small part of the earth's population?
When are we going to reach a balance here?

Wednesday, April 29, 2015

Open Curiosity

My intense curiosity followed me throughout my life.
I am interested in exploring some important elements in social discourse.
My unique approach to many social issues is my background and upbringing in a Jewish Iranian family in Israel on one hand and my education and career in biological sciences on the other hand.
I have the ability and desire to view things from both East and West point of view.
These are universal human qualities that I believe should be enhanced and utilized for a better world for all of us:
Collective intelligence
Curiosity, imagination, creativity, resourcefulness
Abundance
Awe, wonder, knowledge, understanding


Tuesday, April 14, 2015

Mohammad from Israel

A young law professor came to talk at the UCLA Nazarian center Feb 11, 2015
Jewish and Democratic?: A Perspective from Israel's Arab Minority
Professor Mohammed S. Wattad
Bright and clever, he has an impressive law career.
He started his talk by telling us about a conference he attended in Canada where he presented himself to a Canadian judge: "I am Mohammad from Israel."  The judge asked "How come?"  This comment made him think deeply about his identity and having to explain that he is an Israeli Arab.  He does not feel as a Palestinian but as an Arab.
He talked as a lawyer from a legal point of view and tried to keep religion out of his discussion. He described the partition plan by the British, which he read very carefully:
“Two states to two people: One state Jewish with an Arab minority, a second state Arab with a Jewish minority.  BOTH PALESTINIANS.”  Ben Gurion accepted the plan, but the Arabs rejected it.
He pointed out that Israel has no constitution; therefore it is wrong for anyone to claim that it is a constitutional democracy.  He talked about Israel's series of basic laws jokingly saying that Jews have a hard time agreeing on anything, so that is why there was never a constitution.
One of the basic laws from 1992 deals with human dignity, liberty and the right to life.
(If I understand correctly there are no laws dealing with freedom of speech or social and economic rights.)
The main body that keeps law and justice in Israel is the 15 member Supreme Court, the only body that protects human rights and democracy.  It is the Supreme Court that established the democratic facets of the state.  He brought examples of the Supreme Court decisions.
He talked about Israeli Arabs not serving in the army. But the issue is that soldiers who do serve are discriminated to be the only ones protecting the security of Israelis, including orthodox Jews and Arabs who do not serve.  One of the solutions was that those who do not serve in the army would serve in another kind of National service.
Mohammad made a very clever point saying that in that case every Israeli should have a choice how to serve.  This is very clever again.  Legally it makes sense.  But practically this is a trap for IDF.  The power of IDF is that EVERY ISRAELI is a soldier. It is the strength of the whole, the strength of the spirit.
People asked him about the impossibility of a separate Palestinian state and mentioned that withdrawals from Lebanon and Gaza brought in Hezbollah and Hamas.  His answer was that Israel was the one who created Hamas as opposition to PLO.  In addition he claimed that a unilateral withdrawal is not the same as a negotiated withdrawal.

My question to Mohammad and any Arab is: Where do they expect the Jews to live, be independent and have freedom of religion?  I told him I understand his feelings of being a minority.  I mentioned my family’s history from Mashhad where they were forced to convert to Islam, to Israel where they are free as Jews.  It is the only place where Jews can live freely.  Even in the US, the greatest democracy and defender of human rights I am in the minority.  Mohammad had no answer for me.

I want to stress here that I have followed many opinions of moderate Arabs.  They invariably find intelligent informed facts to point out why Jews cannot keep the state of Israel into the foreseeable future:
The Arabs build their homes along the slope of the mountains.  Jews build high rise buildings that stick out of the natural curve of the hill.  They do not belong in this land.
The title of this talk is most ubiquitous: Israel cannot be Jewish and Democratic.  
There are a million ways to prove this point, but I stress: Israel MUST be Jewish and democratic.  It has to be.  There is no other option.  The Arab neighbors of Israel need to accept it, understand it and participate in making sure this is the case.
The continuous efforts of Arabs to criticize everything done by Israel, to demonize it, boycott and sanction it only prolongs the conflict and there will never be any winners.


The announcement about the speaker: 
Since its inception, Israel was established as a constitutional democracy, even in the absence of a constitution, primarily due to the leading role that the Supreme Court has played in this context. In this talk, Professor Wattad will address various perceptions of Jewish democracy, recent changes in Israeli distribution of power, how Israel’s minorities are affected, and how a Jewish democracy will and should play out in Israel’s future. From his unique perspective, he will also discuss the importance of the court system and rights for minorities, as well as current threats to Israel’s democracy.
Professor Mohammed S. Wattad is a legal scholar specializing in international and comparative criminal law, comparative constitutional law, international law, and legal issues surrounding war, torture, and terrorism. A graduate of Haifa University School of Law, Wattad holds a Master of Law degree from The Hebrew University of Jerusalem. He also attended Columbia University as a Fulbright Scholar, where he earned his Juris Doctorate and another Master of Law degree. From 2003-2004, he served as a legal clerk at the Supreme Court of Israel under the supervision of Justice Dalia Dorner. He is currently an assistant professor at Zefat College School of Law in Israel and is editor-in-chief of the Journal 'Medicine and Law'.

Sunday, March 29, 2015

Israel and Water

In February 2015 I attended a lecture about Israel and water and learned much about the business side of water:
Israel and Water: Collaboration, Innovation, and Global Leadership”
Booky Oren, Chairman and CEO, Booky Oren Global Water Technologies

Water shortages persist as a major issue all over the world. In 2013 however, Israel overcame its water challenges through implementing a variety of technological solutions, making 2013 Israel’s “Water Independence Year.” In this talk, Booky Oren will discuss Israel’s innovative water solutions and how they can be leveraged in a global context to create economic growth while also assisting billions of people worldwide.
Booky Oren is not an engineer but an MBA.
He started the talk with two maps of the Middle East.  One from space.  The second one the underground water flows.  In both maps there were no borders.
(Ah how many of us would like a world without borders...)
In 1912 the British calculated that the water resources in the area of the Palestine mandate can support a population of 2.5 million.  Today there are 14 million people living in the area.  
I would like to stress our human ingenuity, the advances we made in science and technology.  I do not prescribe to any idea of shortages and lack of this or that.  It is in our power to bring abundance into our lives and that of our fellow humans.
Water has been used in war and in peace.  In 1967 Syria tried to block the water resources to Israel as part of their goals in the six day war.  In 1994 Israel signed a peace treaty with Jordan where they promise to provide Jordan with all their water needs.  2013 was marked as the year of water independence for Israel.
Booky Oren is interested in the commercial aspects of water.  He was CFO of Israeli companies such as Mekorot and Netafim.  He is now involved in i2i “Innovation to Implementation.”
He claims water technology can solve many problems around the world.  Like me he is convinced that there is plenty of water, there is abundance!  He has a global perspective and he pointed out that politicians are still using water for political gains.  They will keep the same old infrastructure and red tape in any possible way they can to slow down implementations of new technology.  If there is a drought in one place there is flood in other places so this is where we should allow our ingenuity to take over.  He brought the example of desalination plants in Israel.  For years the budget did not include operation of these plants.  The year there was a drought the operation of the desalination plants was instantly funded.
Israel needs to leverage its technology for partnerships with water utility companies.
In closing the speaker pointed out a list of proven innovative global water technologies that can improve the sector:
Israel: ELTAV www.eltav.com, OUTLOCKS.
Switzerland: Gutermann. 
Canada: viva modeling
Spain: Aqualogy
Germany: HSTsystem
USA: FATHOM http://www.gwfathom.com/
UCLA: NORIA



Friday, March 20, 2015

Ethnicizing Soccer

On Feb 23 I attended a lecture at UCLA Center for Jewish Studies:

People of the Book or People of the (Foot) Ball? Ethnicizing European and Latin American Soccer.

This sounded like such a benign subject.
The first speaker was Raanan Rein from Tel Aviv University.  He talked about soccer in Argentina.
The second speaker, John Efron a historian from UC Berkeley talked about soccer in the UK.  In London the Jews support these soccer teams: Arsenal, Tottenham and Chelsea.
For some reason Tottenham is considered the only “Yuden” team.  They play in the White Hart Lane stadium.
He described the chanting in the stadium in a scary manner.  Imagine a drum beat and the sound of 40,000 men chanting: YID, YID,  YID, YID,  YID, YID.  This chantings goes on for 90 minutes!
He had a video taken on a London train of a group of men singing:
I got foreskin
I got foreskin
Don’t have you?
Fucking Jew!
The worst chant is the sound of hissing, sssssssssssssss  imitating the sound of gas in the gas chambers.


In the following discussion the differences between the US and  Europe were pointed out: America society is quite violent with many guns everywhere.  At the football stadium people are “better behaved.”  European societies are not as violent, the violence erupts in the football stadiums.  
About the speakers:
John M. Efron (UC Berkeley)


While most historians would agree as to the centrality of sports in general and of soccer in particular in Latin American societies, very little has been written on ethnicity and sports in such immigrant societies as Argentina and Brazil. As far as the historiography of the Jewish experience in Latin America is concerned, hardly any scholarly works exist that are devoted to popular culture, particularly that of unaffiliated Jews.
Raanan Rein examines Argentine football as a space of both prejudice and dialogue. Rein argues that for the first immigrant generation, belonging to this club was a way of becoming Argentines. For the next generation, it was a way of maintaining ethnic Jewish identity, while for the third it has become a family tradition.
raanan_rein2-180-180_5Raanan Rein